VA - (4 and 5 Mos. Post-Separation) | |||||||
Code | Rating | Condition | Code | Rating | Exam | ||
Recurrent Vestibulopathy | 6204 | 10% | Meniere’s Disease | 6205 | 30% | 20050125 | |
Migraine Headaches | 8100 | 10% | Migraine Headaches | 8100 | 10% | 20050214 | |
Other x 5 | 20050214 | ||||||
Combined: 60% |
UNFITTING CONDITION | VASRD CODE | RATING |
Recurrent Vestibulopathy (Meniere’s) Disorder | 6204 | 30% |
Migraine Headaches | 8100 | 0% |
COMBINED | 30% |
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00927
The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The Board acknowledged the VAs decision to rate the condition of BPPV with associated headaches and photophobia under the above mentioned code. In the matter of the BPPV condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 6299-6204 IAW VASRD §4.87.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00690
He was again noted to have 100% discrimination and normal hearing on the right with no hearing on the left. The C&P ear exam noted that, by history, he still walked with unsteadiness and had difficulty with sudden movements. The Board then considered the appropriate disability ratings.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00388
He was issued a permanent P3/H3 profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the chronic left mastoiditis, vertigo (following erosion of horizontal canal), and hearing loss conditions as unfitting, rated 10%, 10% and 0% respectively, with application of the Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). In the matter of the vertigo and the hearing loss conditions, the Board unanimously recommends that the conditions be...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00629
If the CI were instead rated under codes for vertigo and headache, the rating would be more favorable to the CI. Minority Opinion : The Action Officer recommends separate migraine headaches and vertigo coding and rating in this case regarding the very strong evidence of the migraine headaches and vertigo as separately unfitting conditions. To say that a 10% rating more accurately reflects the disability picture of the CI, rather than the use of an alternate scheme that rates the individual...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00542
The Vertigo and Left AC Shoulder Separation were determined to be medically unacceptable and the CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined to be unfit for continued Naval service, and separated at 20% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations. While the CI did have chronic low back pain there is insufficient evidence in the STR to determine this condition was unfitting at...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02829
The non-medical assessmentnoted that the CI lost 10 hours per week due to her condition, including time atmedical appointments.At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination(performed 3 months prior to separation), the CI reported that her migraine headaches started when she went on a ship and continued since then, but with decreased frequency on continuous preventive medication. The Board first considered if the “migraine associated dizziness” was a separately unfitting condition at...
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2006-135
The DVA stated the following: The injury occurred on August 27, 1970 in which you were diagnosed with Meniere’s syndrome by the military doctor after the physician performed an examination in service. This application was submitted approximately thirty-two years after the applicant’s FPEB proceedings and discharge from the Coast Guard. A medical diagnosis by the DVA some thirty years after the applicant’s discharge from the Coast Guard does not establish that at the time of his...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01325
The CI was then medically separated with a 10% disability rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the headaches and dizziness following head trauma condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CIs disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00197
The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. The Board determined therefore that the stated condition was not subject to service disability rating.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00093
CI CONTENTION : “My rating from the Air Force combined two disabilities into one, where the VA found it to be two separate conditions. In the matter of the neurocardiogenic syncope associated with depressive disorder condition, the Board unanimously recommends that it be rated for two separate conditions as follows: neurocardiogenic syncope as unfitting, rated 10% by a vote of 2:1 and coded 8299-8210 IAW VASRD §4.124a; and depressive disorder unanimously as not unfitting. The pertinent...